top of page
FACULTY LEARNING COMMUNITIES
About Faculty Learning Communities

The P3 Collaboratory’s Faculty Learning Communities are peer-led groups of up to 10 faculty, staff, and graduate students who meet regularly throughout the academic year to explore a topic or project connected to pedagogical innovation, faculty development, or publicly-engaged scholarship. Faculty Learning Communities stimulate collaboration; encourage a peer-support model for learning and action; bridge disciplinary boundaries; and support community-building among participants across the university.

 

Faculty interested in proposing and facilitating a Faculty Learning Community in AY 2026-2027 are encouraged to apply by Friday, 3rd July 2026. 

​

The P3 Collaboratory provides administrative and technical support to organizers while each group sets its own agenda, goals, and deliverables for the year. Facilitators receive a stipend of $1,000. The call for participants will be issued once the FLC topic is selected.

​​​

Interested in facilitating one of the Faculty Learning Communities? Apply below.​

​​​​​​​

​

2025-2027  NASEM "Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education"
13197-Chi-Ken-Lu.avif

Chi-ken Lu

Previous Co-Facilitator

Research Associate

School of Arts and Sciences

Math and Computer Science

13198-Robert-Alonzo-Lyman.avif

Robbie Lyman

Previous Co-Facilitator

Assistant Professor

School of Arts and Sciences

Math and Computer Science

Our FLC will unpack the NASEM report "Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education" and the NASEM report's findings and recommendations to investigate how the principles outlined in the article:

​

  • already show up in STEM programs at RU-N and;

  • can be furthered, developed or adopted on our campus.

​

This FLC will be ongoing in the 26-27 academic year to implement initiatives and projects with outcomes presented at the end of year.

​

If you have a successful practice to share, please identify and describe your initiative and indicate which of the NASEM principle(s) it aligns with. This inventory will help build a toolbox and connect faculty for effective STEM teaching at RU-N. 

9510-Diane-Jammula.avif

Diane Jammula

Associate Teaching Professor

School of Arts and Sciences–Newark

Physics

13204-Bruno-Richard.avif

Bruno Richard

Assistant Research Professor
School of Arts and Sciences–Newark

Mathematics and Computer Science

Participants

2024-2025 Student-Engaged Bias-Free Grading
Chloe-Sudduth-120x180.jpg

 Chloe Sudduth 

Ph.D. student 

Rutgers-Newark School of Criminal Justice

Rosheka-Faulkner-scaled-e1656524269674-120x180.jpg

Rosheka Faulkner

Ph.D. student 

Rutgers-Newark School of Criminal Justice

In reading bell hooks’ engaged pedagogy, we aimed to bridge practices of bias-free grading with the values and holistic teaching approach outlined in the book. This collective is designed to enable members to explore the idea of “student-engaged bias-free grading” – imbuing bias-free grading with the principles of engaged pedagogy – and provide space for members of the collective to implement these practices into their pedagogical approach and course materials.

​

The literature on bias-free grading offers a wealth of information on when, where, and how bias can arise in grading practices. It also emphasizes and is connected to the literature on how grading and assessment itself can reproduce inequalities and hurt students’ holistic growth through a class. Engaged pedagogy, as envisioned by bell hooks, provides a reframing of the purpose and intention of education from simply about rote memorization and respect for hierarchy and authority, and towards a process-oriented, holistic, transformative educational experience for both students and teachers. The values at the heart of engaged pedagogy offer a rich framework through which we can explore and integrate practices of bias-free grading towards the development of “student-engaged bias-free grading”.

​

During our 7-week FLC, we learned about engaged pedagogy and bias-free grading, have opportunities to workshop teaching materials, and receive constructive peer feedback on these materials all while developing relationships with other members of the Rutgers community who are interested in cultivating their skills as teachers.

​

This collective, itself, will practice the values of engaged pedagogy and hopes to offer a rich, supportive environment for thinking through and applying these principles to members’ pedagogical practice. The FLC will also create a digital resource archive with theoretical as well as practical, applied content to support current and future Rutgers educators interested in developing their pedagogical approach.

2023-2024 Student Belonging Institute

The “Student Belonging Institute” (SBI) presented and discussed research on social belonging and learning mindsets, and employed an online curriculum developed to support practical teaching approaches that bolster student engagement, increase equity in academic outcomes, and support student success. Faculty participants in the SBI cohort met in both Fall and Spring semesters of this academic year and worked together to revise their course materials to foreground student-centered messages and policies. The SBI also involved a survey component that gave (or at least endeavored to give) faculty a real-time glimpse of their students’ belonging certainty or belonging uncertainty at various points in the Spring term. This was an ambitious training program that relied deeply on participants' willingness to be open and share classroom observations and pedagogical reflections.​​

Participants

2022-2023 Leveraging Microcredentials to Improve Student Outcomes
Liss headshot_edited.jpg

Digital credentials, interchangeably known as microcredentials, take a variety of forms and they are quickly growing as workforce and career development tools. Our FLC is about learning how to create cost-free microcredentials for RU-N undergraduates (academic credit or co-curricular). We are particularly interested in microcredentials that represent a verifiable module of skill and knowledge that has value to an employer or industry (i.e. industry-aligned, competency-based microcredentials). 

​

​

How-To Guide for Departments

​

How-To Guide for Faculty

​

Value & Quality in Digital Credentials

​

Jesse Liss

Sociology, SAS-N

2021-2022 Critical Digital Pedagogy 
Screen Shot 2022-02-09 at 12.59.40 PM.png

Lance Thurner

History, SAS-N

This FLC worked to understand and implement digital teaching tools and strategies in classroom and research projects. Themes covered were: 

​

  • Putting Students First! – Explore and push the boundaries of student-centered education.

  • Learning Lab – Learn best practices for implementing digital pedagogy tools in your classrooms (irrespective of discipline). Participants will be invited to present and workshop their own digital pedagogical projects to receive feedback and support.

  • Critical Pedagogy – Consider how critical pedagogies have identified unique affordances of digital tools that support democratic educational practices in alignment with feminist, anti-racist, and decolonial pedagogical approaches, and much more! 

2020-2021 Accessibility and Faculty-Student Success
AC2EEDC3-B138-472F-BFA1-BCE00E0DCB7D_edi
sheffield_allen.news_page.jpg

Cristhian Altamirano

Disability Specialist, Office of Disability Services-Newark

Allen Sheffield

Director, Office of Disability Services-Newark

This FLC researched and learned about how to make learning more accessible for students with disabilities. Themes there were covered include: 

​

  • Impacted Students: Engage in courageous conversations on stereotypes, micro-aggressions, implicit or explicit bias, and misconceptions of disability services and what it means to be a student and have a disability. Participants gained familiarity with blogs, poetry and other forms of art by individuals with disabilities that capture the experiences, frustrations, and wins of this community of students. 

  • Accommodation Implementation: Learn best practices for implementing accommodations effectively in your courses, and how the Office of Disability Services can be a resource for faculty in this regard.  

  • Accessible Teaching Practices: Learn about universal design and how to make your courses more accessible for all students, and with an emphasis on students with disabilities.  

  • Assessment Strategies and Managing Concerns: Learn how to handle requests from students with disabilities outside of their accommodations, how to manage grade appeals due to accommodations, how to address behavioral and wellbeing concerns in learning environments. 

bottom of page